skip to main content

THE IMPACT OF RESIDENTS ATTITUDE TOWARD SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT USING SUS-TAS: MEDIATING ROLE OF TOURISM INVOLVEMENT

*Anisa Aprilia orcid scopus  -  Agribusiness, Agriculture Faculty, Brawijaya University, Indonesia
Edlyn Khurotul Aini  -  Faculty of Administration Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Kartika Putri Kumalasari  -  Faculty of Administration Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Yusri Fajar  -  Faculty of Cultural Studies, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2024 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Currently, the concept of sustainable tourism development is critical, especially how local communities participate. This research aims to investigate the elements that influence the development of sustainable tourism in the biosphere reserve area of Alas Purwo National Park, Banyuwangi, namely environmental factors, social cost participation, and long-term planning mediated through tourism involvement. Using a survey method, the approach was empirically tested on a sample of 170 locals living close to the Alas Purwo National Park reserve. The questions are divided into two sections: the first includes socio-demographic and economic data on the respondents, and the second includes research tools made up of 25 questions utilizing a Likert scale with a maximum score of five. A questionnaire was administered to 170 respondents, who were subsequently evaluated using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS. All variables were found to have a substantial effect on sustainable tourism development, as mediated by the variable tourist involvement. The community has great potential to assist the growth of ecotourism that is sustainable. To manage tourism in a more sustainable manner, particularly in the biosphere region that needs to be conserved, the government, particularly local governments, local communities, and tourists are required. 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: biosphere reserve, sustainable tourism, tourism involvement

Article Metrics:

  1. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2023. Tabel Jumlah Devisa Sektor Pariwisata (Miliar US $) di Indonesia Tahun 2021. Indonesia Statistic Database. https://www.bps.go.id/subject/16/pariwisata.html#subjekViewTab5
  2. Bajrami, D. D., Radosavac, A., Cimbaljević, M., Tretiakova, T. N., & Syromiatnikova, Y. A. 2020. Determinants of residents’ support for sustainable tourism development: Implications for rural communities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(22): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229438
  3. Choi, H. S. C., & Sirakaya, E. 2005. Measuring residents’ attitude toward sustainable tourism: development of sustainable tourism attitude scale. Journal of Travel Research, 43(4): 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287505274651
  4. Elshaer, I., Moustafa, M., Sobaih, A. E., Aliedan, M., & Azazz, A. M. S. 2021. The impact of women’s empowerment on sustainable tourism development: Mediating role of tourism involvement. Tourism Management Perspectives, 38(June 2020): 100815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100815
  5. Eslami, S., Khalifah, Z., Mardani, A., & Streimikiene, D. 2018. Impact of non-economic factors on residents’ support for sustainable tourism development in Langkawi Island, Malaysia. Economics and Sociology, 11(4): 181–197. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-4/12
  6. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. 2014. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). In SAGE, 46(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002
  7. Ilkhanizadeh, S. 2021. Sustainable tourism and the role of stakeholders in North Cyprus: a literature review. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 13(4): 468–475. https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-02-2021-0034
  8. Jeelani, P., Shah, S. A., Dar, S. N., & Rashid, H. 2022. Sustainability constructs of mountain tourism development: the evaluation of stakeholders’ perception using SUS-TAS. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(8): 8299–8317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02401-8
  9. Kala, D., & Bagri, S. C. 2018. Barriers to local community participation in tourism development: Evidence from mountainous state Uttarakhand, India. Tourism, 66(3): 318–333
  10. Kline, R. B. 2016. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th ed. In Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th ed. Guilford Press
  11. Lin, C. H., Wang, W. C., & Yeh, Y. I. E. 2019. Spatial distributive differences in residents’ perceptions of tourism impacts in support for sustainable tourism development—Lu-Kang destination case. Environments - MDPI, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6010008
  12. Obradović, S., Stojanović, V., Kovačić, S., Jovanovic, T., Pantelić, M., & Vujičić, M. 2021. Assessment of residents’ attitudes toward sustainable tourism development - A case study of Bačko Podunavlje Biosphere Reserve, Serbia. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 35(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2021.100384
  13. Park, C. Y., Lee, S. J., Lee, C. K., & Reisinger, Y. 2022. Volunteer tourists’ environmentally friendly behavior and support for sustainable tourism development using Value-Belief-Norm theory: Moderating role of altruism. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 25(November 2021): 100712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2022.100712
  14. Ruhanen, L., Weiler, B., Moyle, B. D., & McLennan, C. lee J. 2015. Trends and patterns in sustainable tourism research: a 25-year bibliometric analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(4): 517–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2014.978790
  15. Song, H., Zhu, C., & Fong, L. H. N. 2021. Exploring residents’ perceptions and attitudes towards sustainable tourism development in traditional villages: The lens of stakeholder theory. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313032
  16. Streimikiene, D., Svagzdiene, B., Jasinskas, E., & Simanavicius, A. 2021. Sustainable tourism development and competitiveness: The systematic literature review. Sustainable Development, 29(1): 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2133
  17. Stylidis, D., Biran, A., Sit, J., & Szivas, E. M. 2014. Residents’ support for tourism development: The role of residents’ place image and perceived tourism impacts. Tourism Management, 45: 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.05.006
  18. Suhartanto, D., Dean, D., Nansuri, R., & Triyuni, N. N. 2018. The link between tourism involvement and service performance: Evidence from frontline retail employees. Journal of Business Research, 83(October 2017): 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.039
  19. Tang, Z. 2015. An integrated approach to evaluating the coupling coordination between tourism and the environment. Tourism Management, 46: 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.06.001
  20. Travel & Tourism Development Index. 2022. Travel & tourism development index 2021: Rebuilding for a sustainable and resilient future. In World Economic Forum (Insight Report May 2022). https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Travel_Tourism_Development_2021.pdf
  21. World Travel and Tourism Council. 2023. A World in Motion Shifting consumer travel trends in 2022 and beyond (Issue January)
  22. Zhang, Y., Cole, S. T., & Chancellor, C. H. 2013. Residents’ Preferences for Involvement in Tourism Development and Influences from Individual Profiles. Tourism Planning and Development, 10(3): 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2012.747984

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.