TECHNO-ECONOMIC UTILIZATION  COMPLETE FEED FOR BEEF CATTLE DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA

Limbang Kustiawan Nuswantara; Bambang Waluyo Hadi Eko Prasetiyono; Agus Setiadi

doi:10.14710/agrisocionomics.v7i2.17812

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v7i2.17812

TECHNO-ECONOMIC UTILIZATION COMPLETE FEED FOR BEEF CATTLE DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA

*Limbang Kustiawan Nuswantara - Animal Sciences, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia

Bambang Waluyo Hadi Eko Prasetiyono - Animal Sciences, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia

Agus Setiadi - Agribusiness, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{Agrisocionomics17812,
    author = {Limbang Nuswantara and Bambang Prasetiyono and Agus Setiadi},
    title = {TECHNO-ECONOMIC UTILIZATION  COMPLETE FEED FOR BEEF CATTLE DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA},
    journal = {Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian},
  volume = {7},
    number = {2},
    year = {2023},
    keywords = {agricultural waste, beef cattle, complete feed, economical analysis, technical analysis},
    abstract = { Complete feed is very crucial for cattle development in Indonesia. This study analyzed the technical and economical use of complete feed from agricultural waste to developing beef cattle in Indonesia. Agricultural waste is arranged into a complete feed based on crude protein and total digestible nutrients. Experimental research and survey research was used in the study. Experimental research used five feeds, namely T0 (feed usually given by farmers), T1 (12% CP, 60 TDN), T2 (12% CP, 63% TDN), T3 (12% CP, 66% TDN), T4 (12% CP, 69% TDN). The technical parameters observed were dry matter digestibility, organic matter digestibility, rumen VFA, and rumen NH3. Data analysis uses Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and if there is a difference, it is continued with the Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT). The economic analysis is revenue, feed costs, and income over feed cost (IOFC). Survey research was conducted on ten beef cattle farmers to analyze the differences between farmers who used complete feed and those who did not. The results showed a difference between complete feed T1-T4 and feed T0 (control). The T3 feed (12% CP, 66% TDN) yielded the best results. Farmers who use complete feed show higher yields compared to farmers who do not use complete feed. Fattening beef cattle with a total of 10 heads with a rearing period of 90 days produced was Rp 9,100,000 with an R/C ratio was 1.05. The conclusion from this study is that using complete feed from agricultural waste can increase the income of beef cattle farmers. This complete feed can be recommended for developing beef cattle in Indonesia. },
   issn = {2621-9778},   pages = {473--479}  doi = {10.14710/agrisocionomics.v7i2.17812},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/agrisocionomics/article/view/17812}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Complete feed is very crucial for cattle development in Indonesia. This study analyzed the technical and economical use of complete feed from agricultural waste to developing beef cattle in Indonesia. Agricultural waste is arranged into a complete feed based on crude protein and total digestible nutrients. Experimental research and survey research was used in the study. Experimental research used five feeds, namely T0 (feed usually given by farmers), T1 (12% CP, 60 TDN), T2 (12% CP, 63% TDN), T3 (12% CP, 66% TDN), T4 (12% CP, 69% TDN). The technical parameters observed were dry matter digestibility, organic matter digestibility, rumen VFA, and rumen NH3. Data analysis uses Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and if there is a difference, it is continued with the Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT). The economic analysis is revenue, feed costs, and income over feed cost (IOFC). Survey research was conducted on ten beef cattle farmers to analyze the differences between farmers who used complete feed and those who did not. The results showed a difference between complete feed T1-T4 and feed T0 (control). The T3 feed (12% CP, 66% TDN) yielded the best results. Farmers who use complete feed show higher yields compared to farmers who do not use complete feed. Fattening beef cattle with a total of 10 heads with a rearing period of 90 days produced was Rp 9,100,000 with an R/C ratio was 1.05. The conclusion from this study is that using complete feed from agricultural waste can increase the income of beef cattle farmers. This complete feed can be recommended for developing beef cattle in Indonesia.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: agricultural waste, beef cattle, complete feed, economical analysis, technical analysis

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 7, No 2 (2023): June 2023

Recent articles

CHARACTERISTICS OF SOCIAL CAPITAL AGRIBUSINESS MICRO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS OF AGRIBUSINESS (MFIA) IN PADANG CITY STRATEGIC FOOD PRICE ELASTICITY IN EAST JAVA INDONESIA THE FACTORS INFLUENCING TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION PROCESS OF FARMERS IN TERM OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION POLICY CASE IN CENTRAL JAVA INDONESIA More recent articles

Anderson, P. H., B. Sylvia., J. B. Pamela, H. C. Nancy, J.W. Parfitt & D.S.P. Patterson. 1977. Biochemical indicators of liver injury in calves with experimental fascioliasis. The Veterinary Record., 100. 43-45
AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. Assosiation of Official Chemist. Inc. Virginia
Cherdthong, A., C. Suntara, W. Khota & M. Wanapat. 2021. Feed utilization and rumen fermentation characteristics of Thai-indigenous beef cattle fed ensiled rice straw with Lactobacillus casei TH14, molasses, and cellulase enzymes. Livestock Science Vol. 245, pp. 104405
Doolatabada, S. S., M. Saria & G. R. Ghorbani. 2020. Effect of partial replacement of dietary starch with fiber and fat on performance, feeding behavior, ruminal fermentation and some blood metabolites of Holstein calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology Vo. 270, pp. 114691
Hartadi, H., S. Reksohadiprodjo & A. D. Tillman. 1993. Tabel Komposisi Pakan untuk Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta
He, Y., H. Wang., Z. Yu., W. Niu., Q. Qiu., H. Su & B. Cao. 2018. Effects of the gender differences in cattle rumen fermentation on aerobic fermentation of wheat straw. Journal of cleaner production Vol. 205: 845-853
Hoerbe, J.B., A. G. Sessim., G. R. Pereira., D. D. Brutti, T. E. Oliveira., & J. O. J. Barcellos. 2020. Cow-calf intensification through the feeding of rice straw. Livestock Science Vol. 242 pp. 104296
Kulkarni, N. A. Shendye & M. Rao.1999. Molecular and biotechnological aspects of xylanase. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 23:411-456
Mor, P., B. Bals., A.K. Tyagi., F. Teymouri., N. Tyagi., S. Kumar., V. Bringi & M. VandeHaar. 2018. Effect of ammonia fiber expansion on the available energy content of wheat straw fed to lactating cattle and buffalo in India. J. Dairy Sci. Vol 101, pp. 7990–8003
Muensri, P., Kunanopparat, T., Menut, P., Siriwattanayotin, S., 2011. Effect of lignin removal on the properties of coconut coir ﬁber/wheat gluten biocomposite. J. Composites: Part A. 42(2): 173-179
Muzaki, M.D.R., Sunarso & A. Setiadi. 2020. Analisis potensi sabut kelapa serta strategi penggunaanya sebagai bahan baku pakan ternak ruminansia. Livestock and Animal Research Vol. 18(3): 274-288
Neto, C.P.C.T., F.F.H. Ferreira, F.C. Bezerra, R.F. Sousa & M.L.F. Cavalcanti. 2004. Efeito de diferentes substratos na aclimatizacao ‘‘ex-vitro” de mudas de Violeta Africana (Saintpaulia ionantha Wendl.). Revista de Biologia e Ciencias da Terra 4(2): 2-6
Nuswantara, L.K., Sunarso., M. Arifin & A. Setiadi. 2020. Fiber components of fermented coconut husk using fiber degrading microbes from buffalo rumen. Jurnal Agripet, Vol. 20, No.1
Nuswantara, L.K., M. Soejono., R. Utomo dan B.P Widyobroto. 2005. Kecernaan nutrient ransum prekursor nitrogen dan energi tinggi pada sapi perah yang diberikan pakan basal jerami padi. J. Indon Trop. Anim. Agric 30 (3): 172–178
Nuswantara, L.K., Sunarso., M. Arifin & Agus Setiadi. 2022. The Utilization of Coconut Coir as Supplementary Feed for Beef Cattle Production. Caraka Tani: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 37(1), 123-131
Purbowati, E., E. Baliarti & S.P.S. Budhi. 2004. Tampilan Glukosa, NH3 dan urea darah domba yang digemukan secara feedlot dengan pakan dasar dan level kosentrat yang berbeda. J. Pengemb. Pet. Trop. 1: 81-85
Schalm, O. N. 1975. Veterinary Hematology. 3rd Ed. Department of Clinical Pathology of Veterinary Medicine. University of California. Lea and Febiger. Philadelphia
Setiadi, A., A. Nurdiansyah., S. Gayatri., S. I. Santoso., S. Nurfadillah., K. Prayoga, J. Mariyono & L. K. Nuswantara. 2021. Beef Cattle Sustainability Determinants Using Structural Equation Modeling in Pati Regency, Central Java. Agriekonomika. Vol. (10), No. 2
Tayengwaa, T., O.C. Chikwanhaa, M. E.R. Dugan., T. Mutsvangwac & C. Mapiyea. 2020. Inﬂuence of feeding fruit by-products as alternative dietary ﬁbre sources to wheat bran on beef production and quality of Angus steers. Meat Science Vol. 161, pp. 107969
Thanh, V.T.K. 2012. The effect on introduction of adding urea to rice straw for cattle and buffalo calves. Livestock Science Vol 150, pp. 111-113
Wannapat, M., R. Pilajun & P. Kongmun. 2009. Ruminal ecology of swamp buffalo as influenced by dietary sources. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 151: 205–214
Ware, R.A & R.A. Zinn. 2005. Effect of pelletizing on the feeding value of rice straw in steam-ﬂaked corn growing-ﬁnishing diets for feedlot cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology Vol. 123–124, pp. 631–642

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Starting from 2021, the author(s) whose article is published in the Agrisocionomics journal attain the copyright for their article. By submitting the manuscript to Agrisocionomics, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.

The author(s) guarantee that:

Their article is original, written by the mentioned author(s),
Has never been published before,
Does not contain statements that violate the law, and
Does not violate the rights of others, is subject to copyright held exclusively by the author(s), and is free from the rights of third parties, and that the necessary written permission to quote from other sources has been obtained by the author(s).

The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in its own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for its own purposes,
The right to archive all versions of the article, and
The right to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published versions of the article (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.

If the article was prepared jointly by more than one author, each author submitting the manuscript warrants that they have been given permission by all co-authors to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf, and agree to notify the co-authors of the terms of this policy. Agrisocionomics will not be held responsible for anything that may arise because of the writer's internal dispute. Agrisocionomics will only communicate with correspondence authors.

Authors should also understand that once published, their articles (and any additional files, including data sets, and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently featured on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Agrisocionomics allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Agrisocionomics to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.