skip to main content

THE ROLE OF FARMERS AND MIDDLEMEN IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF ACTOR NETWORK THEORY: STUDY OF ACTORS ON AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION CHAIN IN KAPONAN VILLAGE, MAGELANG REGENCY, CENTRAL JAVA

Stefany Anindya Putri  -  Economic Science, Faculty of Economic and Business, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga, Indonesia, Indonesia
Wardani Umi Maesyaroh  -  Economic Science, Faculty of Economic and Business, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga, Indonesia, Indonesia
Arifah Arifah  -  Economic Science, Faculty of Economic and Business, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga, Indonesia, Indonesia
Restina Lestari  -  Economic Science, Faculty of Economic and Business, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga, Indonesia, Indonesia
*Widhi Handayani orcid scopus publons  -  Development Study, Interdisiplinary Faculty, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2023 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The agricultural sector plays a role in encouraging the social, economic and trade sectors in Indonesia. However, the income of workers of the agricultural sector, especially farmers, is lower than in other sectors. In addition to the length of the distribution chain, farmers’ dependence on middlemen is also one of the factors responsible for the low income of farmers, including in Kaponan Village, Magelang Regency, Central Java Province. This study aims to (1) identify the actors involved in the distribution chain of agricultural products in Kaponan village and (2) explain the patterns of relationships between actors involved in the distribution chain of agricultural products in Kaponan Village. This research is a qualitative case study research involving eleven informants as primary data sources. The results showed that apart from the three main actors, namely farmers, farmer groups, and middlemen, there were other actors controlling access to sales of agricultural products to supermarkets, namely technology. The relationship between farmers and middlemen in Kaponan Village is a cooperative relationship that indicates a mutualistic relationship. The farmers in Kaponan Village did not feel disadvantaged by middlemen and this relationship does not create dependence, but they feel that middlemen help them provide access to sell their agricultural products. 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: actor network theory, distribution chains, farmers, middlemen, relationship patterns

Article Metrics:

  1. Anindita, R., Nur, B. 2017. Pemasaran Produk Pertanian. Yogyakarta. Andi
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Penduduk Berumur 15 Tahun ke Atas yang Bekerja Selaa Seminggu yang Lalu Menurut Lapangan Pekerjaan Utama (17 Sektor) dan Pendidikan Tertinggi yang Ditamatkan (Orang), 2020-2021. Jakarta. www.bps.go.id
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Tabel Dinamis [Seri 2010] PDB Seri 2010 (Milyar Rupiah). Jakarta. www.bps.go.id
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Tabel Dinamis Jumlah Penduduk Miskin (Ribu Jiwa) Menurut Provinsi dan Daerah. Jakarta. www.bps.go.id
  5. Dewi, S. K. S., Antara, M., & Arisena, G. M. K. (2021). Pemasaran Cengkeh di Desa Penyaringan Kecamatan Mendoyo, Kabupaten Jembrana, Bali, Indonesia. Agro Bali : Agricultural Journal, 4(2), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.37637/ab.v4i2.719
  6. Ebewore, S. O., & Idoge, D. E. (2015). Analysis of Marketing of Garri in Delta State, Nigeria. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University (English Edition), 22(4), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1006-8104(16)30019-8
  7. Hapsari, D. R., & Sarwono, B.K., Eriyanto 2017. Jaringan Komunikasi Dalam Partisipasi Gerakan Sosial Lingkungan: Studi Pengaruh Sentralitas Jaringan terhadap Partisipasi Gerakan Sosial Tolak Pabrik Semen Pada Komunitas Adat Samin di Pati Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 6(2), 120-128
  8. Husna, A. M., Subantoro, R., Istanto. 2020. Analisis Pemasaran Kubis (Brassica oleracea L.) : Studi Kasus Di Kelompok Tani Bumi Jaya 01 Desa Kaponan Kecamatan Pakis Kabupaten Magelang. Mediagro, 16 (1), 36-47
  9. Hutabarat, H. 2013. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Petani Dalam Penjualan Padi Ke Tengkulak Di Kecamatan Jatilawang Kabupaten Banyumas. Agritech, 15(2), 87–104
  10. Imaniar, A., & Brata, N. T. 2020. Relasi Patron-Klien di antara Tengkulak dan Petani Salak dengan Dampak Sosialnya di Banjarnegara. Solidarity: Journal of Education, Society and Culture, 9(1), 837–847
  11. Kurniati, N., Jafrizal, J., & Mufriantie, F. (2019). Teknologi Pengolahan Cabe Merah Bagi Kelompok Wanita Tani Desa Sukasari Kabupaten Kepahiang. JAPI (Jurnal Akses Pengabdian Indonesia), 4(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.33366/japi.v4i1.1215
  12. Latour, B. 1996. On actor-network theory: A few clarifications plus more than a few complications. Soziale Welt, 47 (4), 369-381
  13. Mahmudah, E., & Harianto, S. (2014). Bargaining Position Petani Dalam Menghadapi Tengkulak. Jurnal Paradigma Unesa, 2(1), 1–5
  14. Megasari, L. A. 2019. Ketergantungan petani terhadap tengkulak sebagai patron dalam kegiatan proses produksi pertanian (Studi di Desa Baye Kecamatan Kayen Kidul Kabupaten Kediri). [Tesis Doktoral]. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga
  15. Mohajan, H.K. 2018. Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment, and People 7(1): 23-48
  16. Muzakki, M. H., & Nurhayati, S. 2016. Tinjauan Hukum Islam tentang Praktik Jual Beli Sayur Melalui Wakâlah di Desa Krisik Ponorogo. Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 10(2), 522. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2016.10.2.522-543
  17. Nikmaturomah, L., Setyowati, & Tri Sundari, M. (2016). Analisis Pemasaran Garam Di Kecamatan Kaliori Kabupaten Rembang. Agrista, 4(4), 1–10. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/agrista/article/download/30890/20606
  18. Nuraini, C., Masyhuri, M., Jamhari, J., & Hadi Darwanto, D. (2016). Model Kelembagaan pada Agribisnis Padi Organik Kabupaten Tasikmalaya. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, 2(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.18196/agr.2121
  19. Permadi, R. (2017). Analisis efisiensi pemasaran pisang kepok di kabupaten seruyan. UNES Journal of Agricultural Scienties, 1(1), 120–128. https://faperta.ekasakti.org/index.php/UJAS/article/view/13
  20. Purnawan, E., Navas, N. G. M., Brunori, G., & Yuliska. 2021. Market Function through Small Family Farms- Middleman Interaction and Its Relation to Food Security : Evidence from Indonesia. Proceeding International Applied Business and Engineering Conference 2021, 143–148. https://abecindonesia.org/iabec/index.php/iabec/article/view/59
  21. Priandika, I. M.S., Antara, M., Yudari, I. D. A. S. 2015. Pola Kemitraan Komoditi Padi Sawah antara P4S Sri Wijaya dengan Subak Batusangian, Desa Gubug, Kacamata Tabanan. Kabupaten Tabanan. E-Jurnal Agribisnis dan Agrowisata 4(4): 230-240
  22. Ramadhani, R.K., Suswadi, Sutarno, Handayani. 2019. Strategi Pemasaran Beras Organik Kelompok Tani di Kabupaten Boyolali. Jurnal Ilmiah Hijau Cendekia, 4(1), 87–95. http://ejournal.uniska-kediri.ac.id/index.php/HijauCendekia
  23. Russell, S.D. 1987. Middleman and Moneylanding: Relation Of Exchange In A Highland Philippine Economic. Journal of Anthropological Research, 43(2), 139-161
  24. Sudrajat, J., Isytar, I., & Arifin, N. 2021. Farmers’ Perception and Engagement with the Role of Middlemen: A Case Study of the Vegetable Farmers. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 25(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.7454/hubs.asia.1070220
  25. Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta
  26. Sukiyono, K., & Asriani, P. S. (2020). Chili Price Volatilities and Transmisions at Vertical Markets in Bengkulu Province. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi, 38(1), 29–39
  27. Trisna, A.A.I., Ustriyana, I.N.G, Arisena, G.M.K. 2021. Marketing of vegetables through e-commerce in Bali Province. Agrisocionomics 5(1): 56-67
  28. Yuniarti D., Rahayu, E.S., Harisudin, M. 2017. Saluran pemasaran beras organic di Kabupaten Boyolali. Agrisocionomics 1(2): 112-121
  29. Yin, R.K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th editions). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.