skip to main content

SATISFACTION LEVEL OF RICE FARMERS TOWARD PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM WITH CORPORATE LOGISTICS (PERUM BULOG) IN SEMARANG CITY, INDONESIA

*Adietya Muhammad Riezky  -  Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, Indonesia
Siwi Gayatri  -  Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, Indonesia
Joko Mariyono  -  Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2022 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The phenomenon of farmers selling their harvest has become a common thing. Solutions that can be offered are partnerships. Agricultural partnerships are expected to solve farmers' problems through facilitating product marketing. Partnerships between farmers and partner companies were sought out with cooperation agreements. This study aims to analyze important attributes related to the partnership program, and measure the level of farmer satisfaction with the partnership of Perum BULOG Semarang Branch Office. The study was carried out at the Ngudi Rejeki Gapoktan, Kendal Regency in November – December 2021. This study used a census, with a total of 110 farmers as respondents. The data collection method was interview. The type of data used were primary and secondary. Data analysis used were Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) and Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI). The results show that the main priorities needed by farmers were guidance on the quality of harvests, assistance for harvest, guidance to improve farmers' capability, Perum BULOG provides a forum for continuous discussion, easy access to harvest delivery, and get shipping compensation. The result of CSI calculation was 65.1%, which indicated that farmers were satisfied with the performance of Perum BULOG Semarang Branch Office. However, there are a number of things that trigger farmers' dissatisfaction, including the increase in agricultural production prices, while the selling price of farmers' harvests is not always the same, the lack of communication between Gapoktan and Perum BULOG Semarang Branch Office, and the the price of HPP is still low.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Bulog, farmers satisfaction, partnership, public corporation

Article Metrics:

  1. Alam, A. S., & N. Oktavianti. 2020. Level of Farmer Satisfaction with Field Extension Performance (Case Study in Sukasarii Village, Cilaku District, Cianjur Regency). AGRITA, 2(1), 32–45
  2. Arifin, M. 2015. Analysis of Farmers' Satisfaction Level on Agricultural Extension Service Performance (Case Study at BP3K Kalibawang, Kulon Progo Regency, DI Yogyakarta). Agrica Extensiona, 9(1), 40–49
  3. BPS. 2021. Harvested Area and Rice Production in Indonesia 2021 (Provisional Figures) https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2021/10/15/1850/production-padi-tahun-2021-naik-1-14-persen- -temporary-numbers-.html
  4. Chanifah, D. H. Darwanto, & J. Triastono. 2019. Determinants of efficiency and technical inefficiency of local soybean farming in Grobogan Regency, Central Java. Journal of Food, 28(3), 191–202
  5. Hidayat, T., R. Yulida, & Rosnita. 2017. Characteristics of Rice Farmers Participating in the Special Efforts Rice Corn Soybean Upsus Pajale in Ranah Baru Village, Kampar District, Kampar Regency. Online Journal of Faperta University Riau University Students, 4(1), 1–12. https://www.neliti.com/publications/200692/kartuistik-petani-padi-peserta-program-usaha-specialpadi-jagung-kedelai-upsus
  6. Imaniar, A., & N. T. Brata. 2020. Patron-Client Relations between Middlemen and Salak Farmers and Their Social Impacts in Banjarnegara. Solidarity: Journal of Education, Society and Culture, 9(1), 837–847
  7. Juherdi, Cepriadi, & Y. Roza. 2016. Satisfaction Level of Broiler Farmers with Contract Farming Partnership Patterns in Kampar Kiri Tengah District, Kampar Regency (Case Study of PT. Mitra Anugerah Satwa). Student Online Journal (JOM) Faperta, 3(1), 1–15
  8. Kumala Sari, R. 2014. Analysis of Rice Imports in Indonesia. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 3(2), 320-326. https://doi.org/10.15294/EDAJ.V3I2.3838
  9. Latifa, A. 2015. Aktivitas Enzim Ekstraseluler Aspergillus niger dalam Menghidrolisis Tandan Kosong Kelapa Sawit. Undergraduate Thesis. University of Jember Digital Repository. 27. http://repository.unej.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/65672/Ainul Latifah-101810401034.pdf?sequence=1
  10. Nasucha, F., F. S. Nasucha, D. Retnowati, & V. Dewantoro. 2021. Partnership Pattern of Agribusiness Operational Cooperation (KOA) Between Sumarah Farmers Group and PT. Pagilaran in Ngawis 2 Hamlet, Ngawis Village, Karangmojo District, Gunung Kidul Regency. Journal of Social Economic Dynamics, 16(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.31315/jdse.v16i1.4915
  11. Nur, L., L. M. Baga, & N. Tinaprilla. 2017. Business Communication of PT Galih Estetika Indonesia in Improving Sweet Potato Partnerships. Journal of Development Communication, 15(2), 24–36
  12. Public Bureau of Logistics. 2021. 3 Facts on Rice Imports Revealed by Buwas – Perum BULOG. http://www.bulog.co.id/2021/03/29/3-hak-import-beras-di revealed-buwas/
  13. Purnamasari, A., I. Novita, & A. Yusdiarti. 2017. Preference Analysis of Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium r) at the Center for Promotion and Marketing of Ornamental Flowers and Plants, Rawa Belong, West Jakarta. Journal of Agribusiness Sciences, 3(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.30997/jagi.v3i1.1027
  14. Raharjo, T. W. 2018. Community Economic Development Through Strengthening MSME, Cooperative, and Corporation Business Partnerships. Surabaya: Jagad Media
  15. Rusdhi, A., & I. Fachrozi. 2021. Analysis of Partnership Pattern Broiler Agribusiness System in STM Hilir District, Deli Serdang Regency. Scenario (Seminar of Social …. https://journal.pancabudi.ac.id/index.php/scenario/article/view/1179
  16. Samarpitha, A., N. Vasudev, & K. Suhasini. 2016. Socio-economic Characteristics of Rice Farmers in the Combined State of Andhra Pradesh. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 13(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2016/28696
  17. Sugiyono. 2012. Educational Research Methods Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Approaches | Gresik University Library (p. 330). https://digilib.unigres.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=43
  18. Susilowati, S. H., & M. Maulana. 2012. Farming Land Area and Farmer Welfare: The Existence of Small Farmers and the Urgency of Agrarian Reform Policy Agricultural Policy Analysis, 10(1), 28
  19. Wismawati, D. R. 2017. Analysis of Farmer Perceptions of Partnership and Comparison of Organic Caisim Farming at Agribusiness Development Station (ADS). https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/90138

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.